|
|
Mac OS X version
10.6 - Problems with Custom Printer Profiles
(TIP- Print this web page for easy reference.)
Several Mac users have encountered
problems trying to create or use custom printer profiles. There appear to
be some common denominators --
They are
all running Macs using OS X Snow Leopard (version
10.6.2 and earlier). The newest release, version 10.6.3, may solve the
problems described here. We will know soon enough.
Most are printing their images using Photoshop CS4.
The
problems seem to be limited to Epson printers.
The most current thinking indicates
that this problem is with the interface between printer drivers and Snow Leopard,
and also the way in which CS4 operates in the new 10.6 environment
-- it is not a problem with the printer profiles. There are other Mac users -- also
using Snow Leopard and CS4 -- who are having no problems at all. But
they are not using
Epson printers. They are using printer models from Canon or HP and getting
satisfactory results. For these folks,
their custom profiles seem to be working just fine. A little web research
makes it quickly evident that there are LOTS of problems that have been reported
out there by Mac users -- primarily with Snow Leopard, Photoshop CS4, and the
interface with certain printers and printer drivers (particularly Epson).
And apparently, the tech folks at Apple, Adobe, and Epson have been scrambling to figure out how to fix
the problem.
The problems
encountered by various users occur at two points -- (1) when trying to print the
target image for measurement and evaluation -- the critical first step in the
process of creating a custom printer profile; and (2) when trying to print
images with custom printer profiles -- many of which were created and worked
just fine before the introduction of Snow Leopard in August 2009. In the
months since, there have been three updates to the original release of 10.6, and
some of the printing and printer driver issues have been addressed by
these releases. If you are running Snow Leopard, It is imperative that you have installed the latest version, which is now 10.6.3.
Finally, there
appear to be some
workarounds that will allow you to get satisfactory results with your custom
printer profiles.
Before going
any further, there is one more thing you must do -- Check your printer
manufacturer's website to make sure that you have the
most current printer driver for your operating system. It is
probably a good idea to check the Adobe Photoshop website as well, to make sure
there are no updates you should install.
Workarounds for Printing a Target
Image & Using a Custom Printer Profile:
Following are some
key excerpts from two articles. One is entitled,
Solving Recent Profiling Issues With Apple Computers,
Epson Printers, and Photoshop,
by Mark Dubovoy, which appears in the Luminous Landscape
photography forums. The other article is called,
Prints look too dark using printer
driver with Leopard or Snow Leopard,
written by the technical support staff of X-RiteŽ, and posted on that website's
support pages.
************************************************************************************************************************
What
Is the Problem?
Mark Dubovoy's
article
starts off by explaining that he has recently upgraded his MacPro to Snow
Leopard and downloaded the latest Epson driver (6.55) for his Epson 9900 printer.
In doing so, he also decided to
re-profile the papers he normally uses. In Dubovoy's words, he
encountered "...a total disaster. All my profiles were terrible and the test
prints I normally make to check new profiles looked horrible. I was at a complete loss. In general I am very meticulous, and I have never
before experienced any color management issues that were not easily resolved."
In trying to diagnose the problem,
the author went through the usual steps of trying to create a target image.
He says, "A quick look at my prior prints of the profiling
target versus the new ones immediately revealed large visual differences.
It was obvious that a huge amount of color information was being clipped. My
prints of the target were bad prints... and therefore the calculated profiles were also bad.
But, why were the prints bad? I could not figure it out. The usual process
is quite simple, and thoroughly familiar to anyone who has made a profile:
Open the (untagged) target in Photoshop.
Tell Photoshop to “leave as is, don’t color manage”.
Go to File>Print.
In the print dialog select “no color management”.
In the printer driver turn off color management
Print
That is exactly, precisely what I was doing, but the system was not obeying
the commands."
The author checked the Adobe, Apple, Epson and Luminous Landscape forums and found
hundreds of posts from folks having problems with profiles using
Epson printers and Apple computers. This is obviously a serious issue,
and not just an isolated case. He goes on to say, "There were many things said in the forums about the problem originating in
newer versions of the OS, Photoshop, and the Epson drivers, so as a test, I
grabbed an old laptop with OS 10.5, I installed CS 2 and the latest Epson driver
for the 9900 (6.55) . With this combination, I was able to print a perfect target."
Defining the Issue That is
Causing the Problem
The article
explains the issue as follows: "If you are using an Epson printer and Apple computer with the latest operating
system, the latest version of Photoshop (CS4) and one of the latest Epson drivers,
you cannot print a file with no color management. I know that this sounds almost absurd, but it is a fact. A clear consequence of this is that making a profile becomes impossible (however,
there is a workaround, read on).
Please note that I am being somewhat vague on naming specific printer models,
OS versions, and driver versions. The reason is that it appears that this is
a very complicated issue. Different people have problems with different printer
models, OS versions, and driver versions. The problem also seems to appear
with Photoshop CS4, but not earlier Photoshop versions like CS2 or CS3."
Dubovoy
began a quest to find the solution to this problem. He started by trying
to contact all the right people at Adobe, Apple, and Epson; also, some of the
most notable experts on color management.
Apparently,
just about
everyone he contacted joined in the effort and tried to
help figure out what was going on. The author offers exceptional kudos and
thanks to Eric Chan, who is a computer scientist at Adobe Systems, where he
works as an engineer on the Camera Raw team. Eric helped to diagnose the
root problem and formulate the following "workaround" solution.
The
"Workaround" Solution
In Photoshop
CS4:
Open (untagged) profile target image in CS4.
Edit -> Assign Profile... -> Adobe RGB. Click OK.
File -> Print...
Set Color Handling = Photoshop Manages Colors.
Set Printer Profile = Adobe RGB.
Set Rendering Intent = Relative Colorimetric.
Uncheck Black Point Compensation.
Click Print...
In the
Printer driver...
Disable color
management
Open
the menu drop-down to select
Color Matching.
If you are
able, choose Epson
Color Controls, Vendor Matching, or some other similar option. (Choices you see
may vary depending on your printer driver)
DO
NOT
select ColorSync.
(See the example below) (However, if ColorSync is pre-selected and unchangeable,
then continue on with ColorSync. This should work okay.)
Print the
target image...

Choose whatever other driver settings
you normally want to use for printing on your chosen paper (e.g., 16-bit, appropriate
media type, thickness, High Speed = Off, etc.). Then Print.

Dubovoy's article
states
that it does NOT matter that Adobe RGB is used as the profile
in the workaround. You could just as successfully use Pro Photo RGB instead, for example
(the default color space in Lightroom). He says, however, that it DOES matter that you choose the exact same profile in the “Assign
Profile” dialog box and the “Print” dialog box (in CS4).
Also, it is important to make sure
NOT to choose “Working RGB-xxxx” as the printer
profile.
How to Print Your Images Correctly with Your Printer
Profile and Photoshop CS4
To
print your images correctly with your new printer profile, follow these steps in
CS4:
Open your image in
CS4
Edit -> Assign Profile... -> Adobe RGB (or other
source profile, if applicable). Click OK.
File -> Print...
Set Color Handling = Photoshop Manages Colors.
Set Printer Profile
to the custom ICC printer profile you wish to use
Set Rendering Intent = Relative Colorimetric
-or- Perceptual
Select
Black Point Compensation,
if desired.
Click Print...

In
the Printer driver...
Disable color
management
Open the menu
drop-down to select Color Matching.
ColorSync will show
as pre-selected and unchangeable. This is okay -- this setting will
work correctly.
Select the same paper
type and quality settings that you used when you printed your target image.
Print your image...
What is the Technical
Explanation?
From Dubovoy's
article:
"Advanced users who wish to build their own custom profiles (or have custom
profiles made via a service) need to print untagged profile target images.
Conceptually, the pixel values in these target images need to pass unmodified
from the printing application (e.g., Photoshop) to the printer driver. There
should not be any type of color transformation applied to the profile target
image. So far, so good.
However, when printing from Photoshop CS4 in “No Color Management” mode
on Leopard (10.5) or Snow Leopard (10.6) to a recent Epson driver, the OS appears
to be applying a color transformation (via ColorSync) to the profile target
image data before handing it off to the printer driver. Specifically, the OS
is converting the image pixel values from the Media Type-specific profile to
sRGB. For example, if you are using an Epson Stylus Pro 3800 and have set the
Media Type in the driver set to Premium Luster, then the default profile “Pro38
PLPP” will be shown in the “Advanced Color Settings” of the
driver. ColorSync then performs a conversion of the target image data from
Pro38 PLPP.icc to sRGB, then hands the result off to the driver. The result
is a bogus target print. Regrettably, it is not entirely clear at this time
what is triggering the conversion.
In the meantime, the workaround described above allows profile targets to
be printed, regardless of OS version or driver version. Effectively, the workaround does this:
Tag the (previously untagged) target image with a profile;
doing so doesn’t change the pixel values,
Ask
Photoshop during print to perform a conversion to the same profile
(e.g., Adobe RGB to Adobe RGB), which effectively does nothing (i.e., null
transform), since the source and destination profile are the same, and
Tells
the OS not to perform any additional conversion, since the application
(Photoshop) already handled the color transform; the OS then hands off
the Adobe RGB-tagged image as-is to the driver, with no modification.
The end result is that the profile target image pixel values go straight through
the system with no change, which is what we’ve been trying to achieve
all along. This is why it does not matter whether you choose Adobe RGB, ProPhoto
RGB, etc., for this workaround. The central idea is to (1) cause Photoshop to
avoid doing a color transform (implemented by making sure the source and destination
profiles are the same), and (2) to convince the OS that the data being
provided by the app has already been color transformed, and hence the OS won’t
interfere.
The reason you don’t see these issues when printing from Photoshop versions
CS2 and CS3 is because they use the older Apple print APIs, which are now deprecated
in Leopard and Snow Leopard."
************************************************************************************************************************
The excerpts
and information included above were taken from two articles that are published
on the web:
Solving Recent Profiling Issues With Apple Computers,
Epson Printers, and Photoshop,
written by Mark Dubovoy
in November 2009. The article appears in its entirety as a tutorial on
the
www.luminous-landscape.com
website.
Prints look too dark using
printer driver with Leopard or Snow Leopard,
written by technical support staff of
X-RiteŽ
in November 2009. The article appears in its entirety on the technical
support pages of the
X-RiteŽ website,
www.xrite.com.
|